Can a turbocharged car be fuel efficient? - na cars means
Did I hear someone say that once a turbo engine as cheap or cheaper than NA-drive could run the car when not in use. They thought that the turbo takes away complete the work on the engine must be small when air is sucked into the piston cylinder. Fine, but that does not mean that there will be a little more air into the cylinder, the team has to compensate with fuel? And then theres the little work of a turbocharged engine is to be done to the exhaust through the turbo-push. Do you have to undo what the turbo does not charge for admission?
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Na Cars Means Can A Turbocharged Car Be Fuel Efficient?
3 comments:
If you have to reduce the RPMs that the Turbo is not actually used, it is possible that the comparable fuel economy better, I suppose. Of course, since this is a manual transmission, and changes are very small.
We can more or less. Able for the same amount of energy, especially in small engines, turbos to better fuel economy. It's not just the turbo, the engine must be built to operate at higher compression, the benefits of the efficiency of combustion at high temperature and pressure can occur to take. Diesel seem to have the greatest advantage of them. There are a lot smaller and more efficient turbo there. (We, I mean everywhere, but the United States)
Yes, you said is wrong, turbos and super chargers or with more fuel, while in phases due to the momentum that the team reserves the right to fuel ratio, the more fuel-air --
Post a Comment